Accuracy of a two-lever operant discrimination task : Three experiments

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorBraud, William G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberChute, Douglas L.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSheer, Daniel E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBurch, Neil R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCapobianco, Rudolph J.
dc.creatorBroussard, William Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T20:09:10Z
dc.date.available2020-07-22T20:09:10Z
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.abstractLittle research is currently available concerning the most accurate method for assessing discriminative control during a two-lever choice operant task when extinction sessions are utilized. Past and present research has noted a decrease in correct bar presses during extinction when compared to correct bar presses during reinforced responding. Investigators have noted an apparent 'cue-search' exhibited by animals during extinction testing and have proposed that the elimination of the food reinforcement cue is responsible for searching behavior and subsequent low discrimination scores. A growing body of evidence obtained from operant discrimination experiments, psychopharmacology research, and motivational investigations is reviewed here and methods for elimination of animal searching behavior are proposed. Since extinction sessions, by definition, require the elimination of the reinforcement cue, methods for altering cue valence or cue importance are discussed. A series of investigations was performed to determine the effect of motivational states on performance of a two-lever operant discrimination task. In all experiments, animals were trained to discriminate between tactile cues and then tested during extinction periods. Experiment I investigated discrimination accuracy for groups trained under a food-motivated condition and tested either in a motivated or non-motivated state. Experiment II followed the general pattern of the first investigation but with an additional point on the motivation continuum. Experiment III investigated the effect of amount of preliminary training when in a motivated state and subsequently tested in a non-motivated condition. Results from these experiments indicated that the non-motivated animals performed the discrimination task significantly better than did animals in a motivated condition. In addition, results suggested that a minimal amount of training was necessary to produce accurate, non-motivated discrimination during extinction. There was no discernible relationship observed between number of responses occurring during extinction periods and deprivation level. Results are discussed in terms of the reinforcement cue, cue valence, and state-dependent learning theory.
dc.description.departmentPsychology, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.other2129697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/6781
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. §107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleAccuracy of a two-lever operant discrimination task : Three experiments
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Social Sciences
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Broussard_1975_2129697.pdf
Size:
2.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Legacy Theses and Dissertations (1940-2009)