A comparison of the relative utility of several rational and empirical strategies for forming biodata dimensions

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorOsburn, H. G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMatteson, Michael T.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCampion, James E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSparks, C. Paul
dc.creatorSchrader, Alec Dean
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T14:47:17Z
dc.date.available2022-01-25T14:47:17Z
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.departmentPsychology, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.other2757627
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/8484
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. §107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleA comparison of the relative utility of several rational and empirical strategies for forming biodata dimensions
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Social Sciences
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Schrader_1975_2757627.pdf
Size:
6.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Legacy Theses and Dissertations (1940-2009)