A word association analysis of schizophrenic thought processes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBaxter, James C.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMefferd, Roy B.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSadler, Timothy G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberVineberg, Shalom E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMalin, Jane T.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMcCorquodale, Marjorie K.
dc.creatorHelton, John A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T14:11:08Z
dc.date.available2022-02-11T14:11:08Z
dc.date.issued1976
dc.description.abstractThis study was a comparison of word association patterns of matched schizophrenic and nonpsychiatric patients. Patients were matched in age, sex, race, education, and verbal fluency. A series of ten word association conditions was administered which varied in instructions. The conditions were free association, repeated free association, five continuous associations, popular association, definition of the stimulus, and final free association. Response patterns consisted of (a) response quality (judged by the degree to which a response was a quick, meaningful, single word), (b) response commonality (judged by response rank among responses of a reference group to the same stimulus words), (c) response latency in tenths of seconds, (d) semantic relationship of stimulus-response pairs, and (e) temporal series of two or more responses. These patterns were more compatible with several of the many postulated causes of the schizophrenic condition. It was found that the basic cognitive responses of schizophrenics were not disrupted. Rather, schizophrenic patients tended to change more from one semantic set to another than did nonpsychiatric patients. Schizophrenic responses were less common and less quick, especially after the first continuous association response was produced. The acceptable responses of schizophrenic patients varied more than those of nonpsychiatric patients. Response faults were not fully explained by perceptual mistakes, lack of stimulus word knowledge, motivation, or a calculated effort to appear "sick." The results were more compatible with fluctuating attention and editing deficit postulates.
dc.description.departmentPsychology, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.other2688315
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/8787
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. §107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleA word association analysis of schizophrenic thought processes
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Social Sciences
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Helton_1976_2688315.pdf
Size:
2.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Legacy Theses and Dissertations (1940-2009)