A Comparison of Two Sepsis Risk Identification Methods in the ED

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorKeh, April
dc.contributor.authorHunsaker, Annie
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03T14:36:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-03T14:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-02
dc.descriptionThis project was developed under the mentorship of Dr. Lenora McWilliams PhD, MS, RN, and Dr. Cheryl Brohard PhD, RN, CNS-ONC, AOCN®, CHPCA®.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the Emergency Department, is an EHR algorithm compared with clinical assessment more effective in identifying patients at risk for developing sepsis?en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/3343
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Sepsis Screeningen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Roomen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Health Recorden_US
dc.subjectElectronic Sepsis Screening
dc.subjectEmergency Room
dc.subjectElectronic Health Record
dc.titleA Comparison of Two Sepsis Risk Identification Methods in the EDen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Keh_ROAR_EHR Sepsis.pdf
Size:
952.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.67 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Gessner College of Nursing – Students' Scholarly Works