How a Routine Oro/Nasopharyngeal Suction Versus No Suction at Birth Affects Respiratory and Cardiac Outcomes of Newborns

dc.contributorConnelly, Linda K.
dc.contributor.authorBoado, Carissa
dc.contributor.authorChau, Cindy
dc.contributor.authorNagpacan, Pauleen
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T20:38:42Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T20:38:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.description.abstractObstruction of the oropharynx and nasopharynx passageways in infants after birth is fairly common. Thus, it is a routine procedure to use suction for all neonates. This method prompts the nurse to use a suction device, such as a bulb syringe or a catheter, to remove secretions to aid the baby in ventilation. However, in a baby that is born through clear amniotic fluid and lacks obstruction of these passageways, the need for suction may not be pertinent. Adverse effects such as lower oxygen saturation, have been associated with oro/nasopharyngeal suctioning that deem it more harmful than good, leading to the review of this practice. It is crucial to determine whether there are clear advantages or disadvantages for infants whose airway undergoes suctioning compared to those who do not.
dc.description.departmentNursing, Andy and Barbara Gessner College of
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/16210
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThe author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).
dc.subjectOxygen saturation
dc.subjectNewborns
dc.titleHow a Routine Oro/Nasopharyngeal Suction Versus No Suction at Birth Affects Respiratory and Cardiac Outcomes of Newborns
dc.typePoster

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BoadoChauNagpacan_HowARoutineOro_Fall_2023.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format