Who? What? Why? When? A Tale of ETD Metadata

dc.contributor.authorLong, Kara
dc.contributor.authorLyon, Colleen
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kristi
dc.contributor.authorPotvin, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorRivero, Monica
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Santi
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T15:57:30Z
dc.date.available2016-06-06T15:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-12
dc.descriptionThis presentation was given at the Texas Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Association/US Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Association Region 3 Joint Conference, Waco, TX, February 26, 2015.en_US
dc.description.abstractEarly proponents of ETDs argued that moving from print to electronic format would make “these works more readily accessible to other scholars,” raising the specter that “...theses and dissertations lie moldering in library basements, with no efficient way for researchers to locate the information that may be contained in them” [1]. Accessibility and discovery remain integral to continued work that frames the possibilities and promises of the ETD movement. The widening embrace of ETDs by universities has heightened the need for shared standards of description, to help identify and manage a growing number of documents. In recognition of this need, and in an attempt to improve discovery of these materials, members of the Texas Digital Library (TDL) developed and published descriptive metadata standards in 2008. In the intervening years, new use cases around ETDs have arisen, discrepancies in the standard had been identified, and the Vireo ETD Submission Management System has continued to change. To address these issues, TDL formed a metadata working group in 2014. The group is charged with updating standards and communicating the revised guidelines to other members of TDL. In this panel, members of the TDL ETD metadata working group will speak to our efforts to update the standard. We will provide an overview of the “problem areas” in ETD metadata that we’ve encountered and documented, with examples of potential areas of improvement around these use cases. We will report on our progress, initial findings, and next steps in the process. Christian R. Weisser and Janice R. Walker, “Excerpted: Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Digitizing Scholarship for Its Own Sake,” The Journal of Electronic Publishing 3, no. 2 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0003.209en_US
dc.description.departmentLibraries
dc.identifier.citationLong, Kara, Colleen Lyon, Kristi Park, Sarah Potvin, Monica Rivero, and Santi Thompson. “Who? What? Why? When? A Tale of ETD Metadata.” The Texas Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Association/US Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Association Region 3 Joint Conference, Waco, TX, February 26, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://conferences.tdl.org/txetda/index.php/txetda/TxETDA2015/paper/view/728
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/1303
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectelectronic theses and dissertationsen_US
dc.subjectmetadataen_US
dc.subjectVireoen_US
dc.subjectTexas Digital Libraryen_US
dc.subjectstandardsen_US
dc.subjectElectronic theses and dissertations
dc.subjectMetadata
dc.subjectVireo
dc.subjectTexas Digital Library
dc.subjectStandards
dc.titleWho? What? Why? When? A Tale of ETD Metadataen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TxETDa presentation.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.67 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: