Paradigms Found in Reunification Research

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Matthew A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-06T13:47:54Z
dc.date.available2019-11-06T13:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWhen children are removed from their parents by the child welfare system, reunification is almost always the initial goal and is actually the most likely scenario (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 2014). It is not surprising, then, that the process of reunification is an important area of focus within child welfare research. As with all research topics, child welfare literature is shaped by the studies and the researchers that contribute to it. Those researchers, in turn, are shaped by their own individual paradigms or frameworks in that these paradigms influence the type of research questions that social work researchers attempt to answer and the sources of data they use to do so. The paradigms of positivism, constructivism, and critical theory can be found in much of the reunification literature. The purpose of this paper is to highlight that, while each paradigm has its own strength, a combination of all three provides the best research for explaining, understanding, and addressing the reunification process as a whole. Individual studies are used to highlight this point.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/5252
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Houston Graduate College of Social Worken_US
dc.subjectParadigmsen_US
dc.subjectChild Welfareen_US
dc.subjectReunificationen_US
dc.subjectPositivismen_US
dc.subjectConstructivismen_US
dc.subjectCritical Theoryen_US
dc.subjectPerspectives on Social Worken_US
dc.subjectMatthew A. Walshen_US
dc.subjectParadigms
dc.subjectChild welfare
dc.subjectReunification
dc.subjectPositivism
dc.subjectConstructivism
dc.subjectCritical theory
dc.subjectPerspectives on Social Work
dc.subjectSocial work
dc.titleParadigms Found in Reunification Researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files