Characterizing Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Practice

dc.contributor.advisorChauvot, Jennifer
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLee, Mimi Miyoung
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAndrews, Nicole L.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHutchison, Laveria F.
dc.creatorKurban, Karman
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-10T18:52:41Z
dc.date.available2018-07-10T18:52:41Z
dc.date.createdMay 2016
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2016
dc.date.updated2018-07-10T18:52:41Z
dc.description.abstractEffective teaching with technology requires a developed, nuanced understanding of the complex interplays between three key kinds of knowledge: content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and technological knowledge; and how they play out in specific contexts (Mishra & Koehler, 2006). Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) model for describing this complexity of knowledge is called technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Much of the research about TPACK attends to pre-service and practicing teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about technology and about self-efficacy beliefs regarding integrating technology in practice. Additional research uses rubrics to assess TPACK but are limited in that the data sources are oftentimes only a lesson plan. The purpose of this study was to characterize teachers’ TPACK more comprehensively by attending to the planning of, the implementation of, and reflections about lessons that incorporate technology. The data for the study came from a graduate course for middle school science and mathematics teachers about using technology in instruction. The course was taught four times over four years and included an assignment called the Technology Lesson Cycle. The Technology Lesson Cycle, a representation of how teachers operationalize their TPACK in practice, consisted of a written lesson plan, video of implementation of the lesson, and a written reflection about the lesson. The first phase of this study was the development of a rubric to characterize TPACK. Interrater reliability of the rubric was examined using Intraclass Correlation, and the internal consistency of the scores was tested using Cronback’s Alpha. Once reliability and validity of the rubric was established, fifteen Technology Lesson Cycles were assessed. Findings from the study illustrate that the in-service mathematics teachers’ pedagogical knowledge (PK) and the knowledge components that contain PK are significantly weaker than other components. Among all seven TPACK components, the technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) was the weakest knowledge component. This work brought forward a deeper understanding of how TPACK translates to practice. Recommendations were provided for teacher education programs and for future studies.
dc.description.departmentCurriculum and Instruction, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/3220
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).
dc.subjectTeacher knowledge
dc.subjectTPACK
dc.subjectTechnology integration
dc.subjectRubric Development
dc.subjectTechnology Lesson Cycle
dc.titleCharacterizing Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Practice
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Education
thesis.degree.departmentCurriculum and Instruction, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instruction
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Education

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KURBAN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.81 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: