Turnaround Actions and Performance: Strategies for Underperforming Firms in Growth Industries

dc.contributor.advisorSzilagyi, Andrew
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKeller, Robert T.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGelb, Betsy D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLeung, Patrick
dc.creatorTenBrink, Candace
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-3582-1311
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-10T18:46:34Z
dc.date.available2018-07-10T18:46:34Z
dc.date.createdMay 2016
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2016
dc.date.updated2018-07-10T18:46:34Z
dc.description.abstractOrganizational turnaround has been an important facet of management research for decades. It has been examined from a variety of perspectives; however, findings remain equivocal as to which actions are associated with positive results. Research has been shaped by an ideology, perhaps owing to roots in firm failure, that a firm needs to deteriorate for years and face a crisis in order to recognize and react to a performance decline. What if these concepts erected unnecessary hurdles, contributing to ambiguous results? Perhaps the lengthy period utilized to measure a performance decline and the ensuing turnaround period contribute to the lack of clarity. To minimize the impact of internal and external environmental effects, I examine turnaround performance within a condensed timeframe. Rather than the average period of three years, I analyze performance declines that range from as little as three quarters to three years. I use life cycle theory to guide this study. It serves as both the theoretical grounding in addition to providing a framework for selecting an industry stage—growth. I examine turnarounds by measuring the association between two predominantly studied turnaround actions-¬-operational and strategic actions--and firm performance. The data indicates that underperforming firms in a growth industry are able to recognize and react to a performance decline within a short timeframe. Although a layoff is the only action significantly associated with performance, the situational variable of firm size indicates a significant, negative association with performance. Post hoc analyses indicate that decline severity is also significantly related to turnaround performance in a growth industry.  
dc.description.departmentManagement, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/3172
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).
dc.subjectCorporate turnaround
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.titleTurnaround Actions and Performance: Strategies for Underperforming Firms in Growth Industries
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeC. T. Bauer College of Business
thesis.degree.departmentManagement, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplineBusiness Administration
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TENBRINK-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf
Size:
3.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: