Novice Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Literacy Instruction

dc.contributor.advisorRangel, Virginia Snodgrass
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRolle, R. Anthony
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEmerson, Michael W.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLathan, Grenita
dc.creatorWest-Raymond, Trenice
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-17T02:18:32Z
dc.date.available2017-04-17T02:18:32Z
dc.date.createdDecember 2016
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.date.submittedDecember 2016
dc.date.updated2017-04-17T02:18:32Z
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine if a teacher’s self-efficacy in teaching reading varies according to the type of preparation program in which s/he participated. This study also examined if there are difference in the key components of traditional teacher preparation program and Alternative Certification Program (ACP) and, if so, how the key components are related to the level of teacher self-efficacy in teaching reading. The study focused on novice teachers (less than 2 years of teaching experience) currently teaching reading in kindergarten, first, and second grade in the nation’s seventh largest urban district, Houston Independent School District (HISD). The conceptual premise for this study was Bandura’s (1977) theory of self-efficacy. A teacher’s self-efficacy belief influences how s/he feels, thinks, motivates themselves and behaves when faced with challenges. This study used the Novice Teacher Self-Efficacy in Literacy Instruction Survey (NTSELI), which incorporated items and scales from several surveys, to explore novice teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching reading and those components of their teacher preparation program that were related to their self-efficacy in teaching reading. 104 novice teacher participated in taking the survey. Their responses was collected and analyzed to address the three research questions guiding the study. First, an independent sample t test was conducted to analyze whether there were any significant differences in teachers’ self-efficacy in literacy instruction between teachers prepared in a traditional program and those prepared in an ACP. To examine the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and their preparation in literacy instruction a Pearson’s correlation test was conducted. Finally, two independent sample t test was conducted to analyze if differences exist in the key components of traditional (four-year institution) teacher preparation programs and Alternative Certification Programs (ACP). Some of the results of the analyses provided support for the research hypotheses, while other results did not. First, the results suggested that traditional teacher preparation programs offer significantly more coursework and field experiences than ACPs. They also indicated that only field experience was related to teachers’ level of self-efficacy in teaching reading. The results also indicated that there are no significant difference in the level of teacher self-efficacy to teach reading based upon teacher preparation programs. These findings suggest that teacher self-efficacy is not necessarily impacted by the program they attend but more importantly it is influenced by the quantity of field experience during their preparation. Therefore, it would be potentially beneficial for traditional teacher preparation programs and ACP’s to offer field experiences in reading to increase teachers’ self-efficacy, previous to becoming a teacher of record.
dc.description.departmentEducational Leadership and Policy Studies, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/1728
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).
dc.subjectSelf-efficacy
dc.subjectLiteracy
dc.subjectTeacher preparation
dc.titleNovice Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Literacy Instruction
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Education
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Leadership and Policy Studies, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplineProfessional Leadership
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Education
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WEST-RAYMOND-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf
Size:
798.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: