Browsing by Author "Peters, Christie"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Center Stage: Performing a Needs Assessment of Campus Research Centers and Institutes(2017-04) Malone, Andrea; Martin, Lisa; Peters, Christie; Turner, Cherie; Vaughn, PorciaOutreach to research centers and institutes is often overlooked in academic libraries. This article discusses a needs assessment conducted by the Liaison Services Department at the University of Houston Libraries that reviewed library services to centers and institutes at the University of Houston’s main campus. The assessment was conducted for two purposes: to build collaborations with centers and to determine how the libraries might create new services and/or market existing services to meet the centers and institutes’ growing research needs.Item Cistercian Expansion and Industrial Water Mill Infrastructure in Twelfth-Century France: An Unrecognized Dependency(2016-05) Peters, Christie; Vaughn, Sally N.; Melosi, Martin V.; Laos, NoraCistercians have long been linked with the development and use of industrial water mill technology, but current scholarship downplays this interrelationship. The argument presented here is that the success of the Cistercian Order in twelfth-century France and Europe depended upon the incorporation and use of industrial water mill infrastructure and technology that existed in France prior to the Order’s foundation in 1098. Evidence for the presence of pre-existing hydraulic resources in France, the development of a Cistercian technological system centered on the incorporation and use of these resources, as well as an explanation of St. Bernard’s role in perpetuating an architectural and technological model throughout the Order based upon his own monastery of Clairvaux that incorporated hydraulic infrastructure into its design will be presented here. Taken together, this evidence demonstrates the dependency of the Order on these pre-existing resources.Item Gauging the Need for Scholarly Communications Library Support at a Research University(2016-02-14) Peters, Christie; Thompson, SantiDue to increasing interest in Open Access (OA) on the University of Houston (UH) campus, librarians at UH collaborated with members of the Faculty Senate OA subcommittee to develop a survey to determine the extent of knowledge about and interest in scholarly communications on campus, and to assess the need for a university-wide OA policy and/or scholarly communications-related library support. The 2015 UH Libraries Scholarly Communications Survey included 25 questions that gathered basic demographic information (12%) and covered the topics of scholarly communications (8%), open access (44%), author rights (12%), data management (12%), and repositories (12%). Every college was surveyed with the sample size for each being calculated using a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level, for a total sample size of 810 faculty across thirteen colleges. The survey remained open for two weeks, with a reminder being sent at the beginning of the second week. The target response rate for both the overall survey and each individual college was 10%. While low, this is the standard in the library community due to consistently low faculty response rates. We obtained 88 valid responses to our survey, yielding an overall response rate of 11%. SPSS was used for data analysis, which included standard descriptive statistics and relevant cross-tabulations. Cross-tabulations of questions with individual colleges were only run for the seven of thirteen colleges that yielded a response rate over 10%. Preliminary results indicate that less than 50% of respondents are knowledgeable about open access forms of scholarly dissemination, while 62% indicate that they either do not have the knowledge to negotiate author rights or they simply have not thought about the issue. In terms of data management, while 53% of respondents are confident about describing their data in grant proposals, they are less confident about provisions for data backup (48%), preservation and archiving (43%), and data sharing (39%), all of which are necessary components of a grant proposal’s data management plan (DMP). As methods of scholarly communication evolve, it is critical that researchers be knowledgeable about the expectations of funding agencies, their rights as authors, and their options for disseminating scholarly content. The University of Houston Libraries will use the results of this survey to develop point-of-need services to address these issues on campus, and the results of the survey will be used to inform recommendations about a campus-wide open access policy to the UH faculty senate.