Browsing by Author "Joshi, Anand C."
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Comparison of Naso-temporal Asymmetry During Monocular Smooth Pursuit, Optokinetic Nystagmus, and Ocular Following Response in Strabismic Monkeys(Strabismus, 6/1/2017) Joshi, Anand C.; Agaoglu, Mehmet N.; Das, Vallabh E.Purpose: Under monocular viewing conditions, humans and monkeys with infantile strabismus exhibit asymmetric naso-temporal (N-T) responses to motion stimuli. The goal of this study was to compare and contrast these N-T asymmetries during 3 visually mediated eye tracking tasks-optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), smooth pursuit (SP) response, and ocular following responses (OFR). Methods: Two adult strabismic monkeys were tested under monocular viewing conditions during OKN, SP, or OFR stimulation. OKN stimulus was unidirectional motion of a 30°x30° random dot pattern at 20°, 40°, or 80°/s for 1 minute. OFR stimulus was brief (200 ms) unidirectional motion of a 38°x28°whitenoise at 20°, 40°, or 80°/s. SP stimulus consisted of foveal step-ramp target motion at 10°, 20°, or 40°/s. Results: Mean nasalward steady state gain (0.87±0.16) was larger than temporalward gain (0.67±0.19) during monocular OKN (P<0.001). In monocular OFR, the asymmetry is manifested as a difference in OFR velocity gain (nasalward: 0.33±0.19, temporalward: 0.22±0.12; P=0.007). During monocular SP, mean nasal gain (0.97±0.2) was larger than temporal gain (0.66±0.14; P<0.001) and the mean nasalward acceleration during pursuit initiation (156±61°/s2) was larger than temporalward acceleration (118±77°/s2; P=0.04). Comparison of N-T asymmetry ratio across the 3 conditions using ANOVA showed no significant difference. Conclusion: N-T asymmetries are identified in all 3 visual tracking paradigms in both monkeys with either eye viewing. Our data are consistent with the current hypothesis for the mechanism for N-T asymmetry that invokes an imbalance in cortical drive to brainstem circuits.Item Fixational Saccades and Their Relation to Fixation Instability in Strabismic Monkeys(Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 11/1/2017) Upadhyaya, Suraj; Pullela, Mythri; Ramachandran, Santoshi; Adade, Samuel; Joshi, Anand C.; Das, Vallabh E.Purpose: To evaluate the contribution of fixational saccades toward fixation instability in strabismic monkeys. Methods: Binocular eye movements were measured as six experimental monkeys (five strabismic monkeys and one monkey with downbeat nystagmus) and one normal monkey fixated targets of two shapes (Optotype, Disk) and two sizes (0.5°, 2°) during monocular and binocular viewing. Fixational saccades were detected using an unsupervised clustering algorithm. Results: When compared with the normal monkey, amplitude and frequency of fixational saccades in both the viewing and nonviewing eye were greater in 3 of 5 strabismic monkeys (1-way ANOVA on ranks P < 0.001; median amplitude in the normal monkey viewing eye: 0.33°; experimental animals: median amplitude range 0.20–0.82°; median frequency in the normal monkey: 1.35/s; experimental animals: median frequency range 1.3–3.7/s). Increase in frequency of fixational saccades was largely due to quick phases of ongoing nystagmus. Fixational saccade amplitude was increased significantly (3-way ANOVA; P < 0.001) but by small magnitude depending on target shape and size (mean difference between disk and optotype targets = 0.02°; mean difference between 2° and 0.5° targets = 0.1°). Relationship between saccade amplitude and the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area (BCEA) was nonlinear, showing saturation of saccade amplitude. Fixation instability in depth was significantly greater in strabismic monkeys (vergence BCEA: 0.63 deg2–2.15 deg2) compared with the normal animal (vergence BCEA: 0.15 deg2; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Increased fixational instability in strabismic monkeys is only partially due to increased amplitude and more frequent fixational saccades. Target parameter effects on fixational saccades are similar to previous findings of target effects on BCEA.Item Responses of Medial Rectus Motoneurons in Monkeys with Strabismus(Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 8/1/2011) Joshi, Anand C.; Das, Vallabh E.Purpose: Monkeys reared under conditions of alternating monocular occlusion during their first few months of life show large horizontal strabismus, “A” patterns, and dissociated vertical deviation. “A” patterns manifest as an inappropriate horizontal component in the deviated eye during vertical eye movements (cross-axis movement). The objective of this study was to investigate response properties of medial rectus motoneurons (MRMNs) in relation to strabismus properties. Methods: Burst-tonic activity of 21 MRMNs in the oculomotor nucleus were recorded from two monkeys with exotropia as they performed horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit (0.2 Hz, ±10°) under monocular viewing conditions. Neuronal responses and horizontal component of eye movements were used to identify regression coefficients in a first-order model for each tracking condition. Results: Comparison of position, velocity, and constant parameter coefficients, estimated from horizontal tracking data with either eye viewing, showed no significant differences (P > 0.07), indicating that neuronal activity could account for the horizontal misalignment. Comparison of the position, velocity, and constant parameter coefficients estimated from horizontal tracking and the cross-axis condition showed no significant differences (P > 0.07), suggesting that motoneuron activity could account for most of the inappropriate horizontal cross-axis movement observed in the covered eye during vertical smooth pursuit. Conclusions: These data suggest that, in animals with sensory-induced strabismus, central innervation to extraocular muscles is responsible for setting the state of strabismus. Mechanical factors such as muscle length adaptation (for horizontal misalignment) and pulley heterotopy or static torsion (for “A” patterns) likely do not play a major role in determining properties in a sensory-induced strabismus.Item Spatial Patterns of Fixation-Switch Behavior in Strabismic Monkeys(Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 3/1/2014) Agaoglu, Mehmet N.; LeSage, Stephanie K.; Joshi, Anand C.; Das, Vallabh E.Purpose: Patients with strabismus perceptually suppress information from one eye to avoid double vision. Mechanisms of visual suppression likely lead to fixation-switch behavior wherein the subject acquires targets with a specific eye depending on target location in space. The purpose of this study was to investigate spatial patterns of fixation-switch behavior in strabismic monkeys. Methods: Eye movements were acquired in three exotropic and one esotropic monkey in a binocular viewing saccade task. Spatial patterns of fixation were analyzed by calculating incidence of using either eye to fixate targets presented at various gaze locations. Results: Broadly, spatial fixation patterns and fixation-switch behavior followed expectations if a portion of the temporal retina was suppressed in exotropia and a portion of the nasal retina was suppressed in esotropia. Fixation-switch occurred for horizontal target locations that were approximately greater than halfway between the lines of sight of the foveating and strabismic eyes. Surprisingly, the border between right eye and left eye fixation zones was not sharply defined and there was a significant extent (>10°) over which the monkeys could acquire a target with either eye. Conclusions: We propose that spatial fixation patterns in strabismus can be accounted for in a decision framework wherein the oculomotor system has access to retinal error information from each eye and the brain chooses between them to prepare a saccade. For target locations approximately midway between the two foveae, strength of retinal error representations from each eye is almost equal, leading to trial-to-trial variability in choice of fixating eye.