Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHiscock, Merrill
dc.contributor.advisorCollins, Robert L.
dc.creatorMcCulloch, Katie
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T17:20:41Z
dc.date.available2015-01-06T17:20:41Z
dc.date.createdAugust 2014
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/874
dc.description.abstractThe Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are frequently utilized cognitive screening measures. The goal of the present study was to evaluate: (1) diagnostic utility values (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) of each measure, (2) cutoffs that maximize diagnostic accuracy within a mixed clinical sample, (3) the effect of base rates and severity of cognitive impairment on the efficacy of the screening measures, and (4) the relationship of the screening measure subscores to similar neuropsychological measures. The study included 218 veterans who completed the MMSE, MoCA, and neuropsychological testing. Empirically derived cutoffs across criterion variables – performance at least 1SD or 2SD below average on at least one neuropsychological domain, or dementia versus non-dementia diagnosis -- showed less than 24 and 25 as optimal for the MMSE with sensitivities ranging from 0.32 to 0.44 and specificities ranging from 0.78 to 0.87. Optimal cutoffs for the MoCA were 20, 21, and 25 with sensitivities ranging from 0.44 to 0.73 and specificities ranging from 0.57 to 0.83. Across criterion variables, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with the MMSE total score ranged between 0.59 and 0.70. The AUC of the MoCA ranged between 0.69 and 0.72, which was significantly greater than the MMSE when classifying patients based on the criterion of at least 1SD neuropsychological impairment. The MMSE and MoCA subtest scores showed poor convergent and discriminant validity relative to performance on neuropsychological domains, which indicates poor subscore interpretability. The study provides evidence that use of either the MMSE or MoCA increases classification accuracy beyond the base rate of dementia, although, of the two screening instruments, the MoCA has a relative advantage for classification accuracy at mild levels of neuropsychological impairment.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCognitive Screening
dc.subjectNeuropsychology
dc.subjectMMSE
dc.subjectMoCA
dc.subject.lcshClinical psychology
dc.titleValidation and Diagnostic Utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Screening for Dementia within a Mixed Clinical Sample
dc.date.updated2015-01-06T17:20:41Z
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology, Clinical
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMassman, Paul J.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCirino, Paul T.
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
dc.description.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences


Files in this item


Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record