Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVincent, John P.
dc.creatorBurris Garner, Elizabeth Amy
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-24T17:14:12Z
dc.date.available2014-07-24T17:14:12Z
dc.date.createdMay 2014
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/729
dc.description.abstractResearch suggests that the prevalence of sexual harassment is high in both educational and employment contexts (Foulis & McCabe, 1997). Despite the number of sexual harassment claims, there is a paucity of research examining juror decision making with regards to compensatory damage awards in this context (Cass, Levett, & Kovera, 2010). Research on juror damage assignment in cases of preexisting psychological injury (e.g., “eggshell psyche”) is also sparse. Additionally, little research has been conducted to evaluate the effect that juror attitudes towards sexual harassment have on juror damage awards and the impact of closing arguments on juror decision making. Against this background, the aims of the present study are to (a) expand on previous research by further examining how juror attitudes towards sexual harassment, as measured by the Sexual Harassment Attitude Scale (SHAS; Mazer & Percival, 1989), affect determinations of non-economic, emotional injury claims in a sexual harassment scenario where a plaintiff has preexisting emotional issues (b) test the impact of closing arguments on juror decision making and (c) examine the interaction between closing arguments and juror attitudes on juror decision making, specifically whether juror attitudes towards sexual harassment, as measured by the Sexual Harassment Attitude Scale, will differentially impact juror’s damage awards in response to plaintiff’s or defendant’s closing arguments. The main effect of juror attitude was found to be significant, with mock jurors with intolerant attitudes toward sexual harassment awarding greater amounts in damages than mock jurors with tolerant attitudes toward sexual harassment. The implications of these results are discussed.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDamage Awards
dc.subjectSexual Harassment
dc.subjectCompensatory Damages
dc.subjectEggshell Psyche
dc.subjectPreexisting Psychological Injury
dc.subjectSexual Harassment Attitude Scale
dc.subject.lcshClinical psychology
dc.titleTHE ROLE OF JUROR ATTITUDES TOWARD SEXUAL HARASSMENT ON DAMAGE AWARDS FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASES
dc.date.updated2014-07-24T17:14:12Z
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHayes, J. Ray
dc.contributor.committeeMemberInman, Tonya
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
thesis.degree.majorClinical Psychology
dc.description.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences


Files in this item


Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record