Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuckner, Cameron
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-01T18:43:28Z
dc.date.available2018-06-01T18:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/3070
dc.description.abstractResearchers have proposed only humans can understand that others have minds, and that this fact explains our distinctive abilities to learn language, cooperate politically, use tools and technology, and pass on a complex culture. Recently, however, experiments appeared to show that chimpanzees, dogs, dolphins, and ravens understand that others might see or know the world from a different perspective than their own. Skeptics, however, argued that these experiments can be explained in terms of associative learning mechanisms (think: Pavlov's dog). In this talk, I explain the hidden philosophical assumptions that have deadlocked this debate for almost fifteen years. I end by describing a recent experiment that collaborators and I performed on ravens to overcome the stalemate by requiring ravens to generalize from their own experience and project their knowledge onto others, suggesting that complex social cognition can evolve independently in animals with very different evolutionary history but similar social lives.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleCan Animals Understand That Others Have Minds? Putting Psychology, Biology, and Philosophy Back Together Againen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item


Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • APeX 2017-2018
    This collection gathers materials presented as part of the 2017-2018 APeX Lecture Series

Show simple item record