Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBabcock, Julia C.
dc.creatorKini, Sheetal Satish
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-28T18:49:12Z
dc.date.available2015-08-28T18:49:12Z
dc.date.createdAugust 2015
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10657/1152
dc.description.abstractThe current study reexamines data from Babcock and colleagues (2011) proximal change experiment to discern the differential utility of communication skills-based interventions between Proactive and Reactive batterers. Given that communication styles and motivations for violence are markedly different for Reactive and Proactive batterers, the aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary treatment matching study for Proactive and Reactive batterers. We hypothesized that Proactive men would exhibit more positive emotional and behavioral change following the Accepting Influence intervention while Reactive men would exhibit more positive emotional and behavior change following the ‘Editing out the Negative’ intervention. Partners of Proactive and Reactive men were also hypothesized to exhibit similar patterns of behavioral and emotional changes. Results found that batterers were able to learn both skills equally well. While a series of MANCOVAs found no differences by type of batterers’ response to different interventions, contrast analyses revealed a trend. Reactive batterers tended to feel less aggressive after completing the ‘Editing out the Negative’ intervention in comparison to the Proactive batterers who completed the ‘Accepting influence’ intervention (t= 1.49, p = .10) and tended to exhibit less negative affect in comparison to Reactive batterers that completed the Accepting Influence intervention ( t = 19.1, p = .03). Partners of Reactive men who completed the ‘Editing out the Negative’ intervention also became significantly less aggressive compared to women whose partners completed the ‘Accepting Influence’ intervention (t = 4.67, p = 0.03). Findings of the current study lend some support for tailoring interventions specific to batterer type and eliminating the ‘one size fits all trend’ for batterer intervention programs.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectIntimate Partner Violence
dc.subjectDomestic Violence
dc.subjectProactive
dc.subjectReactive
dc.subject.lcshClinical psychology
dc.titleDifferential Utility of Skills-Based Interventions for Proactive and Reactive Batterers
dc.date.updated2015-08-28T18:49:12Z
dc.type.genreThesis
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology, Clinical
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
dc.contributor.committeeMemberVincent, John P.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRodriguez, Lindsey
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLeung, Patrick
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digital
dc.description.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences


Files in this item


Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record