2023-01-172023-01-17198616162217https://hdl.handle.net/10657/13478The purpose of this study was to test the effects of imagery on reality monitoring. Three age groups (4 year olds, 6 year olds, and adults) were compared to investigate how people discriminate between two memories, both of which were generated by the subject (i.e., an intention vs an action). All age groups performed better when using reproductive or static-induced imagery compared with using non-static induced imagery. In addition, reality monitoring performance was comparable for 6 year olds and adults, while the 4 year olds were at a decided disadvantage. The type of imagery did not affect this developmental trend. Results support the views of reality and imagination advanced by Koffka and Vygotsky and did not support the views of Piaget and Werner.application/pdfenThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. Section 107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.Imagery (Psychology)Thesisreformatted digital