Lence, Ross M.2022-06-212022-06-21197419742751526https://hdl.handle.net/10657/9657This thesis criticizes the traditional understanding of the doctrine of the concurrent majority. That tradition holds the doctrine is designed to protect the rights of the minority. To refute this interpretation, the author examines the introductory and middle sections of A Disquisition on Government, and the "Speech on the Slavery Question" (4 March 1850). It is argued the significant variable in Calhoun's political theory is not rights but, society. Calhoun is found to be engaged in the construction of a true science of politics, founded on strict empirical method.application/pdfenThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. Section 107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.Thesisreformatted digital