2023-02-022023-02-021989-07-25198819418050https://hdl.handle.net/10657/13773The study shows that the exercise of the prosecutor's discretion varies by the jurisdiction. The study seeks to discover if it is the environment surrounding the prosecutor's domain that determines when a prosecutor's discretion is exercised or if it is an internal structural determination. Previous studies of the prosecutorial process serve as a foundation for the research hypotheses. Regression techniques are applied to environment and case disposition data from forty-two Texas prosecutorial organizations. Slight relationships are discovered between discretion in early dismissals and environmental factors. Case studies of two small and two large Texas prosecutors' offices are described through personal interviewing and observation. Questionnaires administered to the prosecutors provide data to rank the structural centralization of each prosecutorial organization. The four case studies are ranked on an environmental pressure scale constructed from the larger data set of forty-two cases. Questionnaire data reveals prosecutor's perceptions of little environmental influence on their case disposition decisions.application/pdfenThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. Section 107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.ProsecutionUnited StatesDecision makingEnvironmental pressures and the urban prosecutor's organization : consequences for district attorney decision-makingThesisreformatted digital