Ogmen, Haluk2018-11-092018-11-09December 22015-12December 2Portions of this document appear in: Agaoglu, Sevda, Mehmet N. Agaoglu, Bruno Breitmeyer, and Haluk Ogmen. "A statistical perspective to visual masking." Vision Research 115 (2015): 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.003; and in: Agaoglu, Sevda, Bruno Breitmeyer, and Haluk Ogmen. "Metacontrast masking and attention do not interact." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78, no. 5 (2016): 1363-1380. doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1090-y.http://hdl.handle.net/10657/3350A stimulus (mask) reduces the visibility of another stimulus (target) when they are presented in close spatio-temporal vicinity of each other, a phenomenon called visual masking. Visual masking has been extensively studied to understand the dynamics of information processing in the visual system. Visual spatial attention is also known to modulate information processing and transfer within the visual system. Since both processes control the transfer of information from sensory memory to visual short-term memory (VSTM), a natural question is whether these processes interact or operate independently. Here, we modeled visual masking by using a statistical framework, and used this theoretical framework along with psychophysical experiments to determine whether and how masking and attention interact. In a psychophysical experiment, observers were asked to report the orientation of a target bar under three different masking paradigms. The distribution of response errors was modeled by using statistical mixture-models. Our results show that in all three types of masking, the reduction of a target’s signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was the primary process whereby masking occurred. We interpret these findings as the mask reducing the target’s SNR (i) by suppressing or interrupting the signal of the target in para-/meta- contrast, (ii) by increasing noise in pattern masking by noise, and (iii) a combination of the two in pattern masking by structure. Recent evidence suggests that the studies that reported interactions between masking and attention suffered from ceiling and/or floor effects. We investigated interactions between metacontrast masking and attention by using an experimental design in which saturation effects were avoided. In these experiments, attention was controlled either by set-size or by spatial pre-cues. We examined attention-masking interactions based on two types of dependent-variables: (i) the mean absolute response errors and (ii) the distribution of signed response errors. Our results show that both the voluntary (endogenous) and reflexive (exogenous) mechanisms of attention affect observers’ performance without interacting with masking. Statistical modeling of response errors suggests that attention and metacontrast masking exert their effects mainly through independent modulations of the guessing component of the mixture model. Taken together, our results suggest that visual masking and attention operate independently.application/pdfengThe author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. UH Libraries has secured permission to reproduce any and all previously published materials contained in the work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).Visual maskingSpatial attentionBayesian modelsMetacontrast maskingParacontrast maskingPattern masking by noisePattern masking by structure2018-11-09Thesisborn digital