A factor analysis study of a test of human relations ability

dc.contributor.advisorMacNaughton, John F.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberOsburn, Hobart G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBlakeney, Roger N.
dc.creatorFrank, Blake Allen
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T20:43:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T20:43:12Z
dc.date.copyright1975
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted as the initial undertaking in determining the construct validity of forms. XL and XM of Supervisors' Problems, a test of human relations ability. Seventy-three industrial-organizational psychology students completed both forms of Supervisors' Problems and a battery of tests including several factorially pure reference tests, the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Leadership Opinion Questionnaire. The scores on the instruments were intercorrelated and factor analyzed. The initial results indicated the two forms of Supervisors' Problems measured different constructs. The variance in form XL was accounted for by three factors-reasoning, leadership, and lie. Variance in form XM was accounted for by only one factor-leadership. These results suggested that the items in forms XL and XM were measuring different constructs. Forms XL and XM were rescored to yield a reasoning and leadership subscore. These scores and the reference test scores were intercorrelated and factor analyzed. The correlations among the reasoning and leadership subscores indicated that the reasoning subscores marginally met the criterion for convergent validity and failed to meet the criteria for discriminant validity, while the leadership subscores met the criteria for both convergent and discriminant validity. The factor analysis revealed that variance in the reasoning subscore was accounted for by a Supervisors' Problems specific factor, and that variance in the leadership subscore was accounted for by a Supervisors' Problems specific factor, a reasoning factor, and a laissez-faire leadership factor. Suggestions for future study of Supervisors' Problems were made.
dc.description.departmentPsychology, Department of
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.other2055386
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10657/11406
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. Section 107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work assume the responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing, or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires express permission of the copyright holder.
dc.subjectHuman relations
dc.titleA factor analysis study of a test of human relations ability
dc.type.dcmiText
dc.type.genreThesis
dcterms.accessRightsThe full text of this item is not available at this time because it contains documents that are presumed to be under copyright and are accessible only to users who have an active CougarNet ID. This item will continue to be made available through interlibrary loan.
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Social Sciences
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology, Department of
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Houston
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Frank_1975_2055386.pdf
Size:
2.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format