• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Published ETD Collection
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Published ETD Collection
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Executive Functioning in Struggling Readers: The NIH Examiner

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    HALVERSON-THESIS-2020.pdf (749.5Kb)
    Date
    2020-05
    Author
    Halverson, Kelly Kathryn
    0000-0002-2787-6796
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Executive functioning (EF) is an important domain general control process implicated in the development of successful reading. While a number of previous studies have investigated the role of EF in children with reading difficulties (RD), results have been mixed due to lack of clarity within the domain and varied assessment methods. In the present study, we investigated the role of EF in a large group (n = 355) of 4th, 5th and 6th grade students with RD. To characterize EF, we utilized the NIH Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (NIH EXAMINER), a novel, short yet comprehensive, and free assessment. We investigated how the broad domain of EF is related to reading on three levels: word reading, reading fluency and reading comprehension, and for the latter, considered the impact of inference making. Results indicated relations of EF to reading consistent with prior work (average r = .26) with this novel measure. Multivariate multiple regression analyses compared the contribution of EF across all reading outcomes in a single model. Results revealed an overall effect of EF on reading, p < 0.001, and significant differences between fluency and comprehension, p < 0.001, and between decoding and comprehension, p = 0.014, but not between fluency and decoding, p = 0.062. The relation of EF to reading comprehension was fully mediated by inference making, and both indirect effects (short and long textual distance) were significant, although they were not significantly different from each other. Results may aid the development of specific reading interventions which consider the important and unique structure and role of EF in struggling readers.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10657/6635
    Collections
    • Published ETD Collection

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsDepartmentsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsDepartmentsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV